E&T<\/em> was told that this happened without any consultation with the indigenous Qulla communities. The corporations are also allowed access to a national park area, the Nevado Tres Cruces (a massif of volcanic origin in the Andes Mountains, see map) as well as a Ramsar site, including Laguna Negro Francisco and Laguna Santa Rosa (map).<\/p>\nIn Balc\u00e1zar\u2019s view, this could lead to consideration of \u201clegal ways to protect indigenous rights, as well as social protests\u201d, similar to those that took place in 2018 after the announcement of the deal between CORFO and SQM, he told E&T<\/em>.<\/p>\nA comprehensive research study that was published this year supports the findings of E&T<\/em>\u2019s investigation and the satellite analysis. Wenjuan Liu and her research colleagues at the School of Sustainability at Arizona State University found that lithium mining in the area bore strong negative correlations with the vegetation and soil moisture \u2013 meaning, the more mining, the rarer plants and water become in the soil.<\/p>\nArguably not 100 per cent caused by brine mining \u2013 a booming tourism industry and a slight population increase also contributed \u2013 the research identified lithium brine mining activities as one of the major stresses affecting local environmental degradation. Two decades,\u00a01997-2017, were studied, recording\u00a0soil moisture, vegetation and temperature. An expansion of lithium brine mining area of one square kilometre was found to correspond to a significant decrease in the average level of vegetation and in\u00a0soil moisture.<\/p>\n <\/picture><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nOther environmental consequences are observable in changes in the region\u2019s microclimate. When climate changes, natural disasters can strike more often.\u00a0At the beginning of the year, the area encountered a period of devastating rains, most untypical\u00a0for the arid area. Ironically, the amount of water precipitated was insufficient to recharge the aqua-reserves, but did cause destructive floods, Balc\u00e1zar recalls. \u201cSan Petro was isolated for almost a month in February due to flooding. The water is now coming also with a lot of salts, with heavy metals, which are naturally present in the environment. It is also affecting the communities that live in these territories\u201d, he told E&T<\/em>.<\/p>\n <\/picture><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nA temperature rise over the course of two decades was observed that may be connectable to the rise in mining activities in the Atacama salt flat. Daytime land surface temperatures were found to have increased considerably\u00a0from approximately 28.4\u00b0C to 32.9\u00b0C in the summer. Winter daytime temperatures climbed to 14.1\u00b0C, from 8.3\u00b0C in 1997.<\/p>\n
Francisco Mondaca, coordinator of environmental issues at the Atacama People\u2019s Council, says mining companies\u2019 assessments of their environmental impacts do not take account of warming temperatures which accelerate the drying process, (according to a report by Bloomberg).<\/p>\n
How do these trends link to climate change? In a report published in early August by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), researchers presented themselves as highly confident in their assumption that current levels of global warming are associated with moderate risks from increased dryland water scarcity; soil erosion; vegetation loss; wildfire damage; permafrost thawing; coastal degradation, and tropical crop yield decline \u2013 many symptoms found by researchers in the Atacama salt-flat mining area.<\/p>\n
Dr Rich Crane, a lecturer in sustainable mining at the University of Exeter\u2019s Camborne School of Mines, cautions that these brine ponds – effectively working as salt pans – not only result in huge amounts of potentially useful groundwater\u00a0being lost to the atmosphere, but also require large areas of land for such evaporation. This results in widespread habitat removal. The irony, he says, lies in the fact that \u201cthe very regions where such brine ponds are so effective, i.e. those which have low rainfall, are often by definition those which can be water-scarce\u201d.<\/p>\n
Records for 2018 issued by the Comit\u00e9 de Miner\u00eda No Met\u00e1lica shows that the companies\u2019 pumping efforts are not illegal, just astonishingly high. Not only brine water but also fresh water is being vacuumed up from the subsurface at a great rate – especially in the case of copper mining, which takes place not far from the brine extraction mines and uses huge amounts of fresh water.<\/p>\n
As part of the production process, copper-rich rocks are crushed into a dust that\u2019s mixed with water to flow through giant pipes. The water is then mixed with chemicals to separate the copper from the slurry.<\/p>\n
<\/div>\n
Despite watertight water-pumping rights, the corporations\u2019 alibi for causing damage has flaws. Brine water is typically 70 per cent water, 30 per cent salt. Despite this, the Law of Mining (C\u00f3digo de Miner\u00eda) defines it not as water but as a mineral. The definition would require reformulation to see any progress in water loss, Balc\u00e1zar argues. The presence of bacteria and other living organisms in the brine sustaining life should count as a scientific argument to \u2018prove\u2019 that salty water is still water, he says.<\/p>\n
The history of how SQM and Albemarle acquired extraction rights is long. Handed to SQM during a period of dictatorship, they were not given under the current environmental law, says\u00a0Balc\u00e1zar. He also laments that the members of the local community were not consulted about the rights to operate near their territories.<\/p>\n
Albemarle\u2019s mineral extraction rights with respect to the Salar de Atacama in Chile cover an area of around 16,700 hectares. They are based on a long-term contract with the Chilean government, which was originally entered into in 1975 by one of the company\u2019s predecessors. It was subsequently amended and restated, according to the company\u2019s latest annual report. Nonetheless, moving forward quickly appears difficult. At present, researcher Garc\u00e9s told E&T<\/em>, Albemarle\u2019s quota increase is delayed because its carbonate plant is not fully operational.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
SQM<\/h3>\n\n
<\/picture><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nComparably little has changed on SQM\u2019s brine pond property between 2015 and 2019, as the following interactive graphic shows:<\/em><\/p>\nThe case of SQM appears to be slightly different from Albemarle\u2019s.\u00a0The company is known to have influence in government circles, but Chilean newspaper La Nacion<\/em> has reported several cases where people associated with the company have faced investigation or trial on matters such as tax evasion and bribery. In 2017, the US Securities and Exchange Commission said SQM had agreed to pay more than $30m to resolve parallel civil and criminal cases, finding that it violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act by making improper payments to Chilean political figures and their associates.<\/p>\nThere is also a question of whether\u00a0SQM knew about the damage its brine pumping operation had on freshwater reserves before independent studies reviewed it.\u00a0SQM claimed in\u00a0earlier\u00a0reports that lakes and salt flats\u00a0were separate, isolated water systems and that brine and freshwater would not blend. Without an independent report, this was taken as the truth until recently, when\u00a0SQM\u00a0acknowledged that there was some interaction between the systems. The truth, that the two water systems do indeed mix – brine and fresh water – which according to research jeopardises nearby freshwater reservoirs, came only to light after independent scientific studies began to publish their own results. However, Garc\u00e9s\u00a0says\u00a0\u201cit is possible\u201d that SQM\u00a0could\u00a0have\u00a0been aware\u00a0of the fact earlier than independent reviews,\u00a0given that the company had studied the area in detail.<\/p>\n
Under the brine extraction rights, Albemarle\u2019s environmental impact appears the lesser of two evils. SQM can pump much more – around 1,700 litres per second, compared with Albemarle\u2019s 400.<\/p>\n
Now a new letter to the Chilean ministry of mining has warned of the inconclusive results issued by SQM\u2019s lithium-mining operation. The letter sent by a chemical engineer to the ministry and seen by\u00a0E&T<\/em> warns authorities that SQM\u2019s records for production would not correspond to the actual figures delivered. At the time of writing, the ministry has not yet responded to the letter, E&T<\/em>\u2019s source claims.<\/p>\n <\/picture><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nIn other words, parts of the total lithium extracted by SQM, numbers for the raw mineral and the final product simply don\u2019t add up. The difference would be worth several billion dollars. Balc\u00e1zar, who came across the letter, has not seen any response from the ministry, so far.<\/p>\n
Researcher Ingrid Garc\u00e9s is worried. \u201cThis is very serious,\u201d she says. On the question of whether the Chilean government should impose harsher regulatory measures on the exploitative water pumping practices by SQM and Albemarle, Garc\u00e9s says there should be sanctions and prosecutions and any penalties should be exemplary. She has little hope this will happen under the current government: \u201cIt is unlikely, as it was under the previous one\u201d.<\/p>\n
Warning signs of water scarcity problems in the Atacama salt flat were visible to companies six years ago, but were largely ignored, as a government inspection report showed. 32.4 per cent of the native Algarrobo trees prosopis chilensis<\/em> on SQM\u2019s property – a drought-tolerant species, sending their roots deep into the underground to survive – were found dying as early as 2013 due to the effects of water shortages.<\/p>\n <\/picture>\nLarge Prosopis chilensis tree in the Talampaya National Park, La Rioja, Argentina<\/p>\n<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
Nowadays, to overturn negative public sentiment, it appears Albemarle\u2019s strategy is to hand out money to municipalities, local universities and communities, Balc\u00e1zar says. \u201cIn this way, Albemarle is very different [from SQM]. They give money to all these communities in the Atacama salt flat, so they can solve basic problems inherited from centuries of systematic abandonment and discrimination by the State\u201d.<\/p>\n
This practice effectively replaces the role of the state, he argues, with the effect that the government loses control over what mining companies actually do. With no government accountability for the damage, \u201cand no actual chance to say no to these projects\u201d, he says, communities are made responsible for controlling and monitoring the levels of water and the operations of the mining projects with the very money the companies give them.<\/p>\n
\u201cAlthough participation and access to first-hand information by local communities is their indisputable right, it is a state duty to look after and ensure water for future generations\u201d, Balc\u00e1zar adds.<\/p>\n
Garc\u00e9s takes a similar view, warning that the Chilean state is failing in its duty to oversee and protect assets that belong to all Chileans. \u201cHow is it possible that we have a General Water\u00a0Directorate in the region with one inspector?\u201c she asks. E&T<\/em>\u00a0has\u00a0been told that the\u00a0directorate has now added two more inspectors.<\/p>\nGarc\u00e9s asserts that compensation payments paid [by Albemarle] to the local communities are not fair. \u201cIt is a major fallacy to think so. The income from extractive activities is not distributed equally among the Chilean population due to structural problems; moreover the money given to local communities, as has happened in many other cases in the country, can be used at will and there is no public control on its use or distribution, which may provoke conflicts and divide the population of San Pedro de Atacama\u201d, she said.<\/p>\n
Albemarle would reach agreements with communities through signing a value agreement, she explains. Three per cent of the sales would be directly paid to communities. This does not solve the structural problem of uneven distribution of wealth in the country – caused by exploitation of minerals – and payments given directly to communities might be unequally distributed. By talking to several community members, \u201cmoney provided does not end up fairly in locals\u2019 pockets\u201d. One scenario possible, she says, is that a lack of control by the state might lead to corruption and could spark disputes.<\/p>\n
Risks and hurdles for brine mining in Atacama salt flat<\/h3>\n\n
There are financial and environmental problems concerning land use. Dr Crane points out that \u201csuch [evaporation] pools can require an operation time of several years and as such can be susceptible to the inherent boom-and-bust nature of the mining industry: if the lithium price were to undergo a significant downturn then there could be a major problem\u201d.<\/p>\n
At the end of last year, the Chilean environmental regulators rejected plans by Albemarle to expand its output from the Salar de Atacama salt flat, according to filings with Chile\u2019s Environmental Assessment Service. Albemarle did not present the \u201cdetails necessary to rule out significant adverse impacts on the quantity and quality of renewable natural resources, including the soil, water and air.\u201d<\/p>\n
Andrew Miller, head of price assessments at Benchmark Mineral Intelligence, confirms the commotion in the market: \u201cOn the supply side, extending the production for these companies was challenged by regulators\u201d. Companies in Chile tried to expand their production around 2016 and 2017 but various government agencies in Chile challenged them.<\/p>\n
Economic challenges as well as regulatory challenges may lie ahead. Brine grew to be the primary source for lithium production for a generation because it is a low-cost source. Despite the extraction and evaporation process being cost-effective for now, changes in demand in the future could present issues for the producers\u2019 bottom lines.<\/p>\n
Miller explains that the two main chemicals resulting from lithium extraction are lithium carbonate and lithium hydroxide. Brine mining is most competitive for lithium carbonate. This would still be the primary chemical on the market \u2013 still, a lot more lithium carbonate is produced than lithium hydroxide. The crucial question from a battery standpoint is whether there will be a shift towards cathode chemistries more dependent on lithium hydroxides.<\/p>\n
Lithium hydroxide is not where brine extraction and the likes of SQL and Albemarle would excel, says Miller. This is because an additional step is required in the process. \u201cThey have to produce lithium carbonate first and then convert it to lithium hydroxide, adding additional costs and pressure on the costs curve\u201d.<\/p>\n
This raises questions on how responsive supply can be to the big surge in\u00a0demand expected in the market, Miller says. It appears certain that hard-rock lithium mining will grow ever more dominant. This is confirmed by data from the US Geological Survey.<\/p>\n
Whether or not the days of brine extraction are numbered, companies like US-based Albemarle today increasingly seek to cover their backs by diversifying their portfolios. According to its annual report, Albemarle entered into an agreement to acquire a 50 per cent interest in Mineral Resources Limited\u2019s Wodgina Project, located in the Pilbara region of Western Australia, forming a joint venture with Mineral Resources to own and operate the Wodgina Project to produce battery-grade lithium hydroxide. The deal is expected to conclude in the second half of the year.<\/p>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Missing data expected to remain a problem going forward<\/h3>\n One way in which Chile\u2019s lithium producers are attempting to appease public concern, as well as that of the regulators,\u00a0is by increasing lithium output while using less brine. According to Reuters, Albemarle is developing a process to boost Chilean lithium output by 30 per cent without extracting more brine from the Atacama. It would re-inject salts into the ponds to effectively increase the concentration of the white metal in successive evaporative steps.<\/p>\n
Garc\u00e9s remains highly sceptical of the apparent good news. The yield – the amount of lithium extracted from the brine – remains brutally low to the present day, only around 30 per cent in SQM and a little more for Albemarle, is her guess, she told E&T<\/em>. Even this would be hard to judge: \u201cThey keep it a state secret\u201d. This ambiguity raises questions about how much lithium is really lost to inefficient practice by operators. \u201cWhy so much secrecy if it is so easy to calculate it? It is not a matter of secret patented process, either\u201d, she says.<\/p>\nSQM was approached by E&T<\/em> but was not immediately available for comments and did not respond to E&T\u2019s enquiries.<\/p>\nOne of the biggest problems is transparency, say\u00a0many\u00a0researchers. The correct calculation of how much water is being lost, according to Garc\u00e9s, is faulty in so far as actual data is being withheld by companies. \u201cUnfortunately the balances are made theoretically and then you estimate the performance or efficiency of the process,\u201d she says.<\/p>\n
It has been possible for E&T<\/em> to piece together an estimate of how much water has been lost to the environment due to brine evaporation over the course of the past three decades, 1985-2017. E&T<\/em>\u2019s estimate puts the figure at around 433 billion litres for water lost as a result of lithium exploration over the period. Albemarle\u2019s extraction contracts previously belonged to Sociedad Chilena del Litio (today under the name of Rockwood).<\/p>\nIf that volume of water was laid out with a kilometre-square footprint across the city of London, the block would protrude nearly half a kilometre into the sky (see graphic), or around four and a half times the height of Big Ben. The amount would also rival the annual fresh water withdrawal rates of small countries like Papua New Guinea or the West Bank and Gaza, according to World Dank data.<\/p>\n
E&T<\/em>\u2019s calculations were made on the basis of figures provided by the Nonmetallic Mining Committee as well as calculations for Albemarle\u2019s lithium brine production history by the head of the Lithium Committee from IIMCh. It was produced under the assumption that two million litres of water would be evaporated in mining ponds for each tonne of lithium extracted. As the lithium extraction process evaporates around 95 per cent of the brine water, it was possible to compute how much water actually disappeared.<\/p>\nPerhaps even more worrying are extrapolations for the future, based on projections for Albemarle\u2019s lithium extraction between 2018 and 2043. 1.5 trillion litres of water may be at stake within the Atacama salt flat, according to the same principle of calculation as above. With\u00a0SQM pumping nearly four times as much brine as Albemarle, it is not unreasonable to assume that rates could be much higher.<\/p>\n <\/picture><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nAlbemarle Corporation\u00a0was given the chance to respond to\u00a0allegations and issued a statement to\u00a0E&T<\/em>\u00a0saying it updated its hydrogeological model of the Salar de Atacama in March with the measurements of the last few years, making it the most up-to-date tool that exists, and that it \u201cserves as a basis for authorities, communities and other companies with operations in the area\u201d.<\/p>\nWhile monetary payments were not mentioned in the response, the company confirms it has established a \u201cseries of voluntary commitments with the authority to ensure the proper care of the Salar ecosystem\u201d –\u00a0entailing \u201ca\u00a0monitoring system of 150 wells in the Salar basin and a permanent plan for water and lake level monitoring, flamingo monitoring and an Early Warning Plan\u201d. All of this would be \u201calways available to the authority and the communities,\u201d Albemarle said, adding: \u201cwe all benefit from sustainable management of the Salar de Atacama.\u201d<\/p>\n
The state\u2019s aspiration to toughen regulation is high but action is scarce. In January, after an investigation proved that SQM did in fact overdraw lithium-rich brine from the Atacama salt flat, the Superintendencia del Medio Ambiente (Chile\u2019s environmental regulator) approved a compliance plan including an online system to monitor SQM\u2019s extraction rates as well as its use of fresh water alongside its industrial process. Whether this is enough to stop overdrawal of brine and prevent environmental damage, many doubt.<\/p>\n
Recent changes by mining companies on how they monitor wells without authorisation, according to Chile\u2019s environmental regulator, make it ever more complex to monitor what companies do.<\/p>\n
\u201cIf you want to exploit, the companies must determine the amount of water they can safely extract without compromising the ecosystem and the wildlife, including the loss of flamingos and other species,\u201d Balc\u00e1zar says.<\/p>\n
Another problem for regulators and the public is to access unbiased information. So far, the only information available\u00a0about the Atacama salt flats are the details shared by the companies. \u201cThe state doesn\u2019t have its own models. This is very basic stuff. You cannot exploit something that you don\u2019t know. If you don\u2019t know the real damage, you cannot regulate it. The state wouldn\u2019t respect this principle\u201d, says Balc\u00e1zar.<\/p>\n
However, efforts to monitor adverse effects independently seem to be under way. In May, the Atacama People\u2019s Council built a monitoring station in a lagoon on the salt flat. Its installation was the first in a series – 14 more stations are expected soon – to continuously monitor water levels, as opposed to the once-per-month measurements overseen by mining companies.<\/p>\n
Before the Chilean President Sebasti\u00e1n Pinera\u00a0took office last March – when his administration disbanded a group working on this – the Committee of Non-Metallic Mining began to work on a model that could have allowed the government to independently monitor environmental changes.<\/p>\n
How and\u00a0whether the Chilean government will vindicate its lithium mining ambitions and the effects climate change has in its land in front of a global audience at the upcoming COP 25 – a global climate change conference taking place in Santiago in December – remains to be seen. Microbiologist Dorador asserts that it is an important opportunity for the country, with regard to mining.<\/p>\n
Next to climate change and environmental issues, lithium production companies are accused of providing poor working conditions for their staff. On Chile\u2019s brine deposits, workers suffer poor health and safety standards, according to an E&T<\/em> interview with Lisa Belenky, senior attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity, a nonprofit organisation fighting to protect endangered species through legal action and activism.<\/p>\nSolutions to the water evaporation frenzy<\/h3>\n\n
Instead of increasing the quota to pump more brine, companies must replace the current evaporation process in the pools with a truly sustainable one, say researchers like Ingrid Garc\u00e9s.<\/p>\n
Answers to the prayers of those asking for a cleaner mining process are in the works. Different technological solutions appear viable in the lab, but many remain very far from being a commercial reality. Dr Crane is confident that science can come up with alternatives: \u201cIn academia, there is a lot of research currently being conducted to improve how we can remove lithium from the earth. Solutions include electrodialysis, nanofiltration and adsorption, as well as recent progress in using graphene-based filtration approaches.<\/p>\n
\u2033[Some of these techniques] have real potential to herald a new paradigm for the mining industry. If someone can invent a truly cost-effective, environmentally friendly, adaptable and rapidly deployable method to extract the lithium from water, they would be very successful\u201d.<\/p>\n
To solve the problem in the Atacama Desert, one may not need to look much further than the United Kingdom. Even without the ultra-dry climate, the county of Cornwall has what it takes, geologists argue. To start with, it has been found to host\u00a0the fifth-largest lithium deposits in the world. A company called Cornish Lithium is developing a solution that should soon allow the pumping\u00a0of\u00a0Cornish geothermal brine and direct extraction of lithium from it in a climate-friendly way, without the use of chemicals, the\u00a0CEO of\u00a0the project has assured. Heat extracted from the brine would provide additional benefits. After lithium and energy were extracted, the brine would be cleanly re-injected into the subsurface.<\/p>\n
\u201cThere is no water loss, there are no chemicals going into the water. The heat brought up with the brine, we can use in an environmental friendly way\u201d, Jeremy Wrathall, CEO of Cornish Lithium, explained.<\/p>\n
Such plans for domestic lithium extraction have multiple advantages. Local production could abolish the need to ship lithium around the world and reduce the carbon footprint connected to lithium-ion battery production. It could also help to alleviate the pressures on Chile\u2019s lithium supply and allow the government to regulate Chile\u2019s lithium mining companies without the risk of pushing global battery supply into turmoil.<\/p>\n
What Cornish Lithium develops may not immediately bear direct application in the Atacama desert, as easy access to power would be needed. If a geothermal power plant could be connected to the brine extraction, though, self-sufficiency may be in sight, Wrathall says. Some companies in Chile could already explore the idea, but to Wrathall\u2019s knowledge, it\u00a0is early days for those projects. In contrast, in Europe, a lot more is going on. Alongside Cornish Lithium, an array of other European companies are chasing the idea of domestic lithium extraction.<\/p>\n
From a market perspective, new technical developments are crucially needed, according to Benchmark analyst Miller. Even with the investments expected going into the market, he expects an upcoming deficit in 2023. Processes in development that may not be commercial today could add that \u201ccritical extra bit to the lithium supply balance in the next couple of years\u201d when the electric vehicle penetration kicks off and lithium demand explodes.<\/p>\n
Methodology and comments:<\/p>\n
* To bring evidence forward, a satellite imagery analysis model was created to test the relationship between lithium brine extraction between hydration and vegetation levels of nearby lagoons and alluvial muds located in the north of SQMs and Albemarle\u2019s evaporation ponds.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Fuente:https:\/\/eandt.theiet.org\/content\/articles\/2019\/08\/lithium-firms-are-depleting-vital-water-supplies-in-chile-according-to-et-analysis\/?fbclid=IwAR0j9BKvRouMgVDe_QNXz4NeSuln0YUQVnHOrqELMrGqiESADQHO2wNwd_4<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Evidence uncovered by E&T appears to show that lithium-mining company SQM is playing a direct role in damaging the local environment in Chile\u2019s Atacama salt flats, as its activities reduce water levels in an already dry region, with severe effects on local communities, protected lagoons and areas of alluvial muds.<\/p>\n
As worldwide battery demand is expected to triple and reach a value of $100bn by 2025, failing to boost lithium supply could make\u00a0or break the global electric vehicle supply chain and jeopardise global climate efforts, a new investigation by E&T finds.<\/p>\n
To ensure supply, lithium mining must increase or otherwise a deficit may harm progress, warn experts. Most of the world\u2019s lithium production takes place in South America, where 70 per cent of global reserves are concentrated. Chile, accounting for 38 per cent of the production, is in a difficult spot. Firms are doing their best to exploit reserves, but environmental concerns increasingly challenge their endeavours.<\/p>\n
Since the lithium rush started, corporations like Sociedad Qu\u00edmica y Minera de Chile (SQM), … Sigue leyendo →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":47642,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,2246],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-47641","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-chile","category-litio"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ocmal.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47641","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ocmal.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ocmal.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ocmal.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ocmal.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=47641"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.ocmal.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47641\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":47643,"href":"https:\/\/www.ocmal.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47641\/revisions\/47643"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ocmal.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/47642"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ocmal.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=47641"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ocmal.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=47641"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ocmal.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=47641"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}